President-elect Donald Trump on Saturday expressed strong support for the H-1B visa program used by foreign technology workers, aligning himself with one of his most high-profile backers, billionaire tech CEO Elon Musk. In doing so, Trump contradicted some of his own supporters who have long opposed the use of such visas, arguing that foreign skilled workers depress wages and take job opportunities away from Americans.

The remarks from Trump came on the heels of a social media broadside by Musk, who vowed to go to “war” to defend H-1B visas, largely seen as vital to Silicon Valley’s talent pipeline. Musk’s stance was not surprising to those who have followed his career: the entrepreneur, born in South Africa, benefited from the H-1B program in his early days in the United States and has since founded or led multiple groundbreaking companies, including Tesla and SpaceX.

Trump’s public endorsement of H-1B visas is particularly noteworthy given his previous actions on immigration. During his first presidency, which ended in 2021, he often restricted or slowed down the approval process for high-skilled work visas, citing a desire to protect American workers. However, his recent statements indicated a shift—at least in tone—and underscored the close political relationship between him and Musk.

“I have many H-1B visas on my properties. I’ve been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It’s a great program,” Trump told The New York Post on Saturday. Critics on the far-right view that statement as out of step with Trump’s past campaign rhetoric, which emphasized prioritizing American workers and curtailing certain types of immigration. Still, the President-elect’s pivot points to a broader tension within his own political base: many tech leaders and influential donors support skilled immigration programs, but the populist wing of Trump’s followers remains wary.

Origins of the Conflict

The immediate catalyst for this most recent debate is an online backlash to Trump’s choice of Sriram Krishnan, an Indian American venture capitalist, as an adviser on artificial intelligence. Krishnan’s appointment drew criticism from right-wing activists who argue that prominent immigrants or foreign-born individuals influence Trump’s policy agenda—especially when it comes to immigration. Some of these activists lump the H-1B visa program into broader concerns about the displacement of U.S. workers and cultural shifts they see as detrimental.

Musk took to social media to respond, defending Krishnan and highlighting the importance of the H-1B program for U.S. competitiveness. He recalled his own journey, noting that he first came to the U.S. from South Africa on student status and subsequently benefited from an H-1B visa. Today, Musk’s companies rank among the more prolific users of H-1B visas in the technology industry. Tesla alone sponsored 724 H-1B visas this year, and SpaceX has also turned to foreign talent for its specialized engineering and aerospace roles.

The H-1B visa program allows U.S. employers to temporarily hire foreign workers in specialty occupations—frequently in the STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). Typically, an H-1B visa is valid for three years but can be extended up to six years or until the holder secures permanent residency (a “green card”). Over the decades, the program has been hotly debated. Proponents argue that it fills critical gaps in the U.S. labor market and fosters innovation, while opponents claim it can depress wages and reduce opportunities for American-born workers.

Trump’s Historically Shifting Stance

During his first presidency, which concluded in early 2021, Donald Trump was broadly viewed as skeptical of the H-1B program. His administration tightened eligibility requirements, raised application fees, and increased the frequency of visa denials or delays, especially in 2020 amid the economic shutdowns. Critics of Trump’s approach claimed that it discouraged talent from coming to the United States and undermined the competitiveness of domestic firms. Major tech corporations, led by giants like Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Amazon, lobbied against these restrictions, pointing out that reducing the ability to hire global talent could slow technology development and hamper American leadership in emerging fields like artificial intelligence (AI).

Yet, Trump’s personal business history has indicated a more flexible attitude toward hiring foreign workers in certain industries, such as hospitality. Multiple reports during his presidency detailed how his golf resorts and hotels had made substantial use of the H-2B visa (which is similar but geared more toward seasonal workers in non-agricultural roles). While that is a different program than H-1B, it reflected Trump’s pragmatic approach to foreign labor: if his businesses needed foreign workers—whether for housekeeping, landscaping, or specialty occupations—he appeared ready to utilize the visa system.

As an extension of this pragmatism, Trump’s latest public statements about H-1B visas could suggest that his initial hardline stance was more about broad immigration policy in response to populist sentiments rather than a comprehensive distaste for all visa categories. By speaking positively about the H-1B program in front of the media, he is signaling that he might adopt a more nuanced position in his upcoming term. This nuance, however, remains a point of contention with some of his more ardent supporters, who believe that restricting or even eliminating certain immigration programs is crucial to protecting domestic employment and maintaining what they see as the cultural integrity of the nation.

Musk’s Involvement and “War” Over H-1B

Elon Musk’s role in the debate goes beyond being a successful entrepreneur. He has become a powerful political figure in recent years, pouring over a quarter of a billion dollars into pro-Trump political committees and technology initiatives aimed at influencing U.S. policy. When Musk tweeted that he would go to “war” to defend the H-1B program, his words carried significant weight. Observers note that Musk’s rhetoric underscores his genuine belief that the U.S. must continue attracting the world’s best and brightest minds to maintain technological leadership—particularly as global competition with China in AI and advanced manufacturing accelerates.

Moreover, Musk’s personal history is emblematic of the American immigrant success story. Born in Pretoria, South Africa, he moved to Canada before ultimately finding his way to the U.S. He has recounted many times how critical access to student visas and later the H-1B system was for him. This, Musk argues, is how the United States fosters entrepreneurship, innovation, and job creation: by welcoming motivated, ambitious foreign-born individuals who create entire industries and thousands of jobs.

Many in the tech world stand firmly behind Musk. They see the fight over H-1B visas as a litmus test for America’s willingness to remain open to highly skilled talent. Without that openness, they warn, the U.S. risks relinquishing its status as a global technology hub. In the short term, that could mean slower innovation in critical fields like autonomous vehicles, robotics, and AI. In the longer term, industry leaders fret that the competition for global talent will tilt in favor of countries with more permissive immigration policies, such as Canada or some European nations.

Far-Right Pushback and Bannon’s Critique

Not everyone in Trump’s orbit shares his or Musk’s viewpoint on immigration. The far-right faction, represented by figures like Steve Bannon, has been vocal about its opposition to what it characterizes as “mass immigration.” Bannon, who has long been a close ally of Trump (though their relationship has gone through periods of tension), often frames the immigration debate in civilizational terms, contending that an influx of foreign workers—legal or otherwise—could threaten the socio-cultural framework of the United States.

On Friday, Bannon released a statement criticizing “big tech oligarchs” for supporting H-1B visas. He argued that although these visas are legal, they are part of a larger pattern of corporate elites favoring cheap foreign labor instead of investing in American workers. In Bannon’s view, corporations and the wealthy entrepreneurial class use their influence to keep visa programs alive at the expense of economic opportunities for native-born citizens.

The tension is hardly new. During his earlier administration, Trump occasionally elevated populist and nationalist voices within his White House, leading to policies that slowed or limited various visa categories. Now, as President-elect once again, Trump faces the tall order of balancing the demands of his far-right supporters with those of his more influential donors and allies in the tech sector. Musk’s significant financial support and public backing could shape how Trump navigates these waters.

Sriram Krishnan and AI

At the heart of this controversy is Sriram Krishnan, an Indian American venture capitalist with expertise in artificial intelligence and social media technology. Krishnan rose to prominence through roles at major technology companies, including Twitter and Facebook, before transitioning to investing in AI startups. His appointment as an AI adviser for Trump’s transition team sparked an outcry among certain nationalist groups who questioned his loyalty and policy influence, based solely on his being foreign-born.

Critics see Krishnan’s involvement as emblematic of the broader “immigration-friendly” stance they accuse Musk and other Silicon Valley leaders of encouraging. But defenders argue that Krishnan’s success story, much like Musk’s, underscores the opportunities that skilled immigrants bring to the U.S. economy. AI is fast becoming one of the most critical sectors globally, with implications ranging from healthcare and transportation to national security. Having an adviser with firsthand expertise could be pivotal to shaping coherent and forward-looking policy in an industry where the U.S. must compete at the highest level.

Legal vs. Illegal Immigration

A key point that Musk and other tech figures emphasized is the distinction between legal and illegal immigration. In their view, conflating the H-1B program—a legal channel for skilled labor—with irregular migration across borders muddies the debate. They argue that high-skilled immigrants who come in on H-1B visas are thoroughly vetted, sometimes waiting years for approval, and are precisely the kind of contributors who help the U.S. remain on the cutting edge of innovation.

Trump’s own rhetoric has often merged different dimensions of the immigration system, repeatedly emphasizing the need to deport undocumented individuals and secure the southern border. His populist supporters see immigration largely as one unified issue, complaining that legal work programs, such as H-1B, might also harm American job seekers. Tech executives, however, stress that these roles frequently require specialized knowledge and cannot be filled easily by the existing U.S. workforce. Hence, they argue, there is no genuine displacement of American workers—rather, the presence of foreign experts expands the industry and creates further demand for supporting roles, which could, in turn, benefit American citizens.

Economic and Policy Ramifications

Beyond the political fireworks, the broader economic landscape looms. The U.S. labor market remains tight in many STEM areas, with demand for computer scientists, software developers, AI researchers, and robotics engineers often outstripping supply. That shortage, experts contend, could become more acute as AI continues to spread into every segment of society—from manufacturing and logistics to agriculture and finance. Companies such as Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, Tesla, and SpaceX all say they struggle to fill specialized roles quickly, and turning away qualified foreign candidates hampers their competitiveness.

Opponents of H-1B, however, reject this line of reasoning. They argue that tech giants use the visa system to hire younger, cheaper labor while sidelining older, more expensive American professionals. They also point to cases where U.S. workers were allegedly asked to train their foreign replacements under threat of losing severance. These high-profile incidents, critics say, prove that companies sometimes exploit visa holders who may fear speaking up about unfair treatment, lest they lose legal status and be forced to leave the country.

In response, Musk and other proponents of liberalized skilled immigration insist that real abuse is rare and that H-1B workers frequently earn salaries comparable to or higher than Americans in similar roles, especially in Silicon Valley. If the goal is to ensure fair wages for all workers—both foreign and domestic—supporters believe labor protections can be strengthened without dismantling the entire program.

Political Alliances and Future Direction

Trump’s about-face on H-1B could be explained partly by his close relationship with Musk. Since the November election, Musk has played a prominent role in the presidential transition. Sources close to the situation say Musk is part of a small circle of advisors helping Trump vet cabinet-level appointments, shape energy policies, and refine tech-centric economic strategies. The synergy between them became even more evident when they were spotted together in Brownsville, Texas, on November 19, 2024, watching a SpaceX Starship test launch. This event, widely publicized, underlined Musk’s clout with the incoming administration.

It’s also worth noting that Trump’s public positions—be they on immigration, trade, or foreign policy—have been known to shift quickly depending on the influence of his inner circle. With advisors like Krishnan who have deep knowledge of AI, and a major ally like Musk, who strongly favors H-1B visas, Trump could champion a more open approach to skilled immigration this time around.

Still, resistance from the far-right, including Bannon, remains formidable. Since Trump’s reelection, these groups have increasingly voiced their displeasure at any perceived betrayals of what they call “America First” ideals. They have pointed to H-1B as an example of how corporate interests and billionaire donors manipulate policy for profit, leaving the “forgotten man” behind.

Immigration, Tech, and the Future of Work

The debate over H-1B visas is ultimately about more than just one immigration program. It reflects a fundamental question: How can the United States remain the global leader in technology and innovation while also addressing concerns about job security, wage levels, and cultural cohesion?

Within the AI domain, for example, foreign researchers and engineers play an especially crucial role. The field of deep learning, large language models, and robotics is advancing rapidly, and top talent is in short supply worldwide. If the U.S. tightens skilled immigration, American companies could find themselves outpaced by competitors in Europe or Asia, which might adopt more open-door policies for high-tech expertise.

Beyond the strategic rationale, there is also a moral dimension for some advocates: the United States, often called a “nation of immigrants,” has built its prosperity on the contributions of individuals from across the globe. Silicon Valley itself is rife with immigrant success stories—co-founders of several top tech firms were foreign-born. From Google’s Sergey Brin (originally from Russia) to Microsoft’s Satya Nadella (India) and Adobe’s Shantanu Narayen (India), the tech landscape has largely been shaped by global minds.

Trump’s Final Word—For Now

While immigration hard-liners might have hoped that Trump would stand with them unequivocally against H-1B visas, his decision to side with Musk surprised few who have closely observed the evolution of his views on skilled labor. Citing his own business experience and acknowledging the necessity of foreign talent in certain industries, Trump reinforced Musk’s assertion that H-1B is vital to America’s economic strength.

“I have many H-1B visas on my properties,” Trump reiterated, clearly referencing how the program intersects with his vast business empire. His statement is sure to feed debates on whether he can consistently uphold an immigration stance that satisfies both his populist base and powerful corporate interests.

For Elon Musk, the public support from Trump solidifies his influence within the incoming administration. Since devoting considerable resources to ensure Trump’s victory in November, Musk has leveraged his status as both business magnate and political ally to shape policy discussions, especially in the tech space. Yet Musk’s vow to go to “war” over H-1B underscores the intensity of these immigration debates. Even if Trump is momentarily on the side of the tech moguls, it remains uncertain whether that stance will hold steady once the administration faces the full complexities of governing.

Looking Ahead

In the months to come, all eyes will be on how Trump’s team translates the President-elect’s words into actual policy. Potential actions include executive orders revising or expanding H-1B rules, legislation introduced in Congress to update immigration law, or new regulations affecting eligibility and wage requirements.

Sriram Krishnan’s appointment as AI adviser could also signal a more inclusive approach, at least for high-skilled immigrants, despite the loud objections of the far-right. If the administration commits to actively courting AI researchers and robotics engineers from around the world, we may see an expansion or reshaping of current visa caps. Meanwhile, business groups like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers will likely push for further reforms to ensure that specialized fields have adequate access to foreign workers.

On the other hand, organizations that question or outright oppose high-skilled immigration programs will attempt to exert pressure. They could point to sporadic abuses of the system to advance their narrative. Activists like Bannon may have fewer direct channels to the White House if Trump increasingly depends on individuals like Musk, but they wield significant influence with parts of Trump’s voter base and conservative media outlets.

Ultimately, Trump’s stance on H-1B will be a leading indicator of the broader approach his new administration takes toward immigration. Will he opt for ideological consistency with the populist segments that catapulted him into office, or will he prioritize the demands of industry heavyweights and corporate donors who stress the necessity of global talent?

For now, one thing is clear: The alliance between Donald Trump and Elon Musk—cemented by a shared reliance on and approval of the H-1B visa program—has set the stage for high-stakes political battles in the coming year. Whether that alliance holds under the relentless pressure of governance remains to be seen. But as of this moment, President-elect Trump’s message is unambiguous: he stands alongside Musk in championing a program once seen as antithetical to his “America First” promise, underscoring the increasingly complex landscape of U.S. immigration policy in the 21st century.

‍